100% Biker & Trike Magazine Forums

100% Biker & Trike Magazine Forums (http://www.100-biker.com/forums/index.php)
-   Biker Chat (http://www.100-biker.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Shades of the old XS Yammie? (http://www.100-biker.com/forums/showthread.php?t=51351)

HOS 20-06-2016 10:09 AM

Shades of the old XS Yammie?
 
https://youtu.be/EndcabT5ePM


I like the look of this new model, the XSR900.
Kinda chunky and basic, but not without the relevant modern bits.

SS2 20-06-2016 11:30 AM

I've seen this in various mags and it gets a lot of folks juices flowing. Doesn't quite hit the mark for me but I have to say it looks great in that video.

HOS 20-06-2016 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SS2 (Post 660617)
I've seen this in various mags and it gets a lot of folks juices flowing. Doesn't quite hit the mark for me but I have to say it looks great in that video.

Its a bit bare bones minimum for a factory bike and a far contrast to the new MT10 which is OTT imo.

HOS 20-06-2016 04:35 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Looking good.

strima 20-06-2016 04:50 PM

As long as it's more reliable than the XS750...

BikerGran 20-06-2016 07:08 PM

Doesn't do it for me - it's just another bike.

SS2 20-06-2016 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strima (Post 660620)
As long as it's more reliable than the XS750...

Hey I had a 77 XS750 and it was dead reliable. Did an indicated 75 in second, then when it didn't have a second gear, it lasted another twelve months before it started melting valves. Great bike;):D

It too though had something just a bit lacking in the looks dept. That image looks good Hos, but others I've seen make it look as BG said, just a bike.

Sure it'll sell well though.

HOS 21-06-2016 05:11 AM

"Its just a bike"......... errr yeah ok.

HOS 21-06-2016 05:15 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Heres another just a bike, the MT10.

Friar Tuck 21-06-2016 06:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HOS (Post 660619)
Looking good.


Yep, but would like to see it with a cockpit fairing like the Fazer 600

Friar Tuck 21-06-2016 06:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HOS (Post 660625)
Heres another just a bike, the MT10.

Now this doesn't do it at all for me. Don't know why, just doesn't.

HOS 21-06-2016 07:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Friar Tuck (Post 660627)
Now this doesn't do it at all for me. Don't know why, just doesn't.

I think its had too much application of the ugly stick?
Not quite a full beating, but definitely had a touch or twelve.

Biker Buster 21-06-2016 07:58 AM

I like the MT01 But it looks as if someone had loads of angular bits loafing around the workshop, sop he just bolted them on, it all looks a bit 'snap-together'.

The XSR however... Mmmm

beef 21-06-2016 11:17 AM

When I took the vn in for its service both of these were on test.
Both look good in different ways. The Mt had a slightly different headlight cover on the one I was playing on.

Both nice to ride an I would of had either of em. Only had a short ride on them but position was good both felt well balanced and capable of being a good everyday bike or just a weekend toy.

just my opinion like.....

SS2 21-06-2016 11:30 AM

They both look like ace Sunday afternoon toys, don't get me wrong. The MT10 is the new king of the road according to reports I've read and i don't doubt it'll boss most anything about on the road. I just don't like the 'Transformers' style headlight/nose fairing bit personally though. Similarly the XSR is almost there for me but I don't like the tank/frame/headstock interface.

Personal opinion innit.

wurzel 21-06-2016 04:03 PM

I reckon if they do the XSR with a little cowl like a Speed triple or the like then it would make a perfect replacement for my XJR13 when it is time to change. I too think the headstock area is a bit cluttered and think it look like there ought to be something behind/under the clock - maybe it is because the light is a little smaller diameter than they were in the past

HOS 21-06-2016 05:31 PM

I like the xsr for its simplicity right down to its single cylinder "clock" which contains the digital displays that are fairly standard and tbh easier to read.

But I've already got a big Jap retro and I'm tuned into that style of bike. A throwback to the 1970s era.
I'm not very keen on the xsr seat unit it looks weak compared to the rest of the bike :(

whistler 21-06-2016 07:04 PM

Not keen on either bike. Not to my taste at all :thumbd:

Strider 21-06-2016 09:47 PM

Where do you put the tent???

RobK 22-06-2016 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SS2 (Post 660623)
Hey I had a 77 XS750 and it was dead reliable. Did an indicated 75 in second, then when it didn't have a second gear, it lasted another twelve months before it started melting valves. Great bike;):D

I had an XS750 I used for a couple of years, when I got it, it had all the gears, by the time sold it I had lost second and third :D

Mind you it was still rideable :)

strima 22-06-2016 09:51 AM

Mine lost second after two months, and the middle valves melted shortly afterwards...

SS2 22-06-2016 11:05 AM

They were consistent, you had to give them that :D

wurzel 23-06-2016 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HOS (Post 660648)
I like the xsr for its simplicity right down to its single cylinder "clock" which contains the digital displays that are fairly standard and tbh easier to read.

But I've already got a big Jap retro and I'm tuned into that style of bike. A throwback to the 1970s era.
I'm not very keen on the xsr seat unit it looks weak compared to the rest of the bike :(

xjr rear just as weak - got through 3 "rear light mounts" due to rentec rack twisting grabrail before i got a rack that braced to rear pegs

HOS 24-06-2016 06:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wurzel (Post 660695)
xjr rear just as weak - got through 3 "rear light mounts" due to rentec rack twisting grabrail before i got a rack that braced to rear pegs

Same as the Busa when it had issues with the rear subframe cracking or snapping. But a lot of that was due to riders fitting huge panniers and topbox with a rider/pillion combination of about 30 stone.
The Busa wasnt designed as a luggaged up touring machine.

Perhaps the bike designers don't appreciate the average size and build of a British rider? :D

SS2 24-06-2016 10:50 AM

I'm waiting for the day the insurers cotton on and refuse to pay out if the design weight is exceeded. My old Triumph Speed Triple had a maximum load capacity of 24 stone (from memory). Me and the missus are around 30 stone before any luggage is thought of. Sure it'll happen, if it hasn't already. Shhhhhh!

critch 24-06-2016 03:28 PM

'orrible...

wouldn't even make a good donor bike either imo....

wurzel 13-07-2016 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SS2 (Post 660706)
I'm waiting for the day the insurers cotton on and refuse to pay out if the design weight is exceeded. My old Triumph Speed Triple had a maximum load capacity of 24 stone (from memory). Me and the missus are around 30 stone before any luggage is thought of. Sure it'll happen, if it hasn't already. Shhhhhh!

After the 2nd i tried asking yam uk for the max design load that the grabrail could take and they had no info just a max total weight or rider/pillioncombined despite the fact it has to take the weight of a pillion using it to brace against

SS2 14-07-2016 11:43 AM

Bent a grab rail on my pals (RIP Wobbs lad) CBR1000 a few year ago. He set away hard coming out of a 30 limit and it just bent clean into a V shape where I was bracing meself with one straight arm :eek:

wurzel 14-07-2016 03:51 PM

I did ask around and maybe Harry can say different but it does nto appear that there are any standards when it comes to grab rail design / strength

Friar Tuck 15-07-2016 06:04 AM

Design a grab rail to do what it's actually meant? Heaven forbid!.....


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.