PDA

View Full Version : fold a $20 bill for twintowers on fire odd


greg
25-09-2007, 02:31 PM
http://www.ufos-aliens.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/dollarbill.htm

dont know if its been on before but this is a bit odd.
by folding a $20 note the twin towers on fire show up and the pentagon on fire and osama is spelt out.

Mrs Reject
25-09-2007, 04:30 PM
Weird :eek:

Mitch
25-09-2007, 04:45 PM
Stuff on the home page about WTC7 is even weirder... like - the news of the building being blown up on BBC news 20 minutes before it actually happened??? :confused: :confused: :confused:

greg
25-09-2007, 05:32 PM
yep thats how i found the site just mooching around some odd stuff out there.

pyro
25-09-2007, 07:20 PM
Stuff on the home page about WTC7 is even weirder... like - the news of the building being blown up on BBC news 20 minutes before it actually happened??? :confused: :confused: :confused:


Actually 40 minutes after, its a British summer time glitch.

greg
25-09-2007, 07:37 PM
what about the bit where the female presenter is live talking about the building haveing collapsed and its still standing behind her ?

krammer
25-09-2007, 07:50 PM
who dream's up these conspiricy theories?

Shifty
25-09-2007, 07:54 PM
I seem to remember the "fold a note" thing doing the rounds not long after 9/11. Bit of an urban myth I always thought

critch
25-09-2007, 08:04 PM
what about the bit where the female presenter is live talking about the building haveing collapsed and its still standing behind her ?
possibly not live footage.... and the person who writes that site hasnt taken his lithium for a while



wot a croc o sh!te

chazz
25-09-2007, 08:12 PM
[QUOTE=greg]http://www.ufos-aliens.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/dollarbill.htm

dont know if its been on before but this is a bit odd.
by folding a $20 note the twin towers on fire show up and the pentagon on fire and osama is spelt out.[/QUOTE

used to be able to do summit like that with the old pound notes,queens ass i think it were

demonchild
25-09-2007, 09:06 PM
if you pluck a chicken, paint it red and stuff a rope up its arse it looks like a balloon....Now thats fuckin weird...Or is it a conspiracy :confused:

Sir Ewok
26-09-2007, 02:04 AM
[QUOTE=chazz
used to be able to do summit like that with the old pound notes,queens ass i think it were[/QUOTE]

I think you still can, something to do with the cleavage beneath her chin.... Probably worse now she is older :p

Doughboy
26-09-2007, 06:15 AM
Personally I think stuff like that is a crock of ****, try hard enough and you can
make anything from anything, Blue Peter taught us this from an early age, same
with Art Attack, given enough bog roll and you too can make a picture of
the Prime Minister falating a Smurf.

slob
26-09-2007, 07:23 AM
If you look carefully into my cavernous arse you can see your sh1tty futre :D Now trhat's scary!

kitkatman
26-09-2007, 05:44 PM
the conspiracy of wanking is also false..........i for one hav'nt gone blind :eek:

Doughboy
26-09-2007, 06:02 PM
the conspiracy of wanking is also false..........i for one hav'nt gone blind :eek:

Oy!........................................>>>>>>>>.......>>>>>>>>...... WE'RE OVER HERE!! :D

slob
26-09-2007, 07:30 PM
the conspiracy of wanking is also false..........i for one hav'nt gone blind :eek:


are you sure cos I have seen your missus! ....*runs like fook :D

Mitch
26-09-2007, 08:23 PM
possibly not live footage.... and the person who writes that site hasnt taken his lithium for a while



wot a croc o sh!te
nah then Critch...
watch this - Ok, it's a tad long, but when you see the building they're talking about supposedly having collapsed some twenty minutes earlier being pointed out, 'still here, 17 minutes later' with a big arrow pointing to it, just before the interview gets cut :D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqqhX8gkhE0&mode=related&search=

the only reason why the interview got cut was because she stopped playing hide the building!

And yes, that was live footage at the time (according the BBC archive). Also, there were no casualties in no 7.

This is the best bit from the beeb themselves...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/bbc_world/

"At 5pm, News 24 repeated the news in its top-of-the-hour headlines sequence and then at about 5.10pm (again according to the clips on the web), Phil Hayton on BBC World says "More on the latest building collapse in NY - you might have heard I was talking a few moments ago about the Salomon building collapsing and indeed it has... it seems this wasn't the result of a new attack but because the building had been weakened during this morning's attack."

Some of the respondents to my earlier blog have suggested this must mean he had inside knowledge - that not only did he know the building had collapsed, he knew why.
Well in one sense that's true - for about an hour, it had been reported that the building was on fire and in danger of collapse. But he did qualify it by saying "it seems" and once again I think there's a danger of reading too much into what I believe was a presenter merely summarising what everyone had been saying during the previous hour.
Of course, with hindsight we now know that our live shot showed the building still standing in the background. But again I point to that confusing and chaotic situation on the ground - the CNN reporter who had talked about the building "either collapsed or is collapsing" also had it clearly in shot behind him, but he acknowledged he couldn't see very clearly from where he was standing. As we know, the building did collapse at 5.20pm, with the first pictures of that being broadcast on News 24 at about 5.35pm."

Makes you think...